Governance and Sustainability in Developing Countries: Intelectual Structure, Trends and Lessons From Brazil and China

Flávio Santino Bizarrias

doi:10.37497/esg.v7iesg.1618

Autores

Flávio Santino Bizarrias Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM), São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-7820

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37497/esg.v7iesg.1618

Palavras-chave:

Governance, Sustainability, Emerging topics, Developing countries, Bibliometric review

Resumo

Objective: The purpose of this research is to analyze the intellectual structure and existing interconnections between governance and sustainability in developing nations, examining the prevailing trends and emerging topics. Additionally, the study compares Brazil and China, which are two of the most significant and diverse developing countries globally, with the goal of elucidating specific differences. This comparison aims to exemplify the similarities and disparities concerning sustainability and governance in these contexts.

Method: A mixed-methods approach through a systematic literature review to build the intelectual strucrure, with the use of the bibliometrix package in R software, and descriptive statistics and t-tests were employed with the World Bank Data to profile some aspects and compare both countries.

Results: Results bring evidence of a main interests related to governance impact and determinants, poluent emissions, corporate responsability and organization/country performance, within the literature. The study also suggets an inverse profile regarding governance and sustainability, with Brazil pointing to better sustainable conditions than China, however, with lesser business aspects to leverage development.

Originality: The study on governance and sustainability in developing countries stands out for its detailed analysis of governance factors affecting pollutant emissions and corporate responsibility. The study also performs a specific comparison between Brazil and China, in terms of sustainable development aspects.

Theoretical contributions: The study highlights a growing academic interest in governance and sustainability in developing countries, broadens the discourse to include key issues like pollutant emissions and corporate responsibility and country performance in terms o patent registration.

Biografia do Autor

Flávio Santino Bizarrias, Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM), São Paulo

Professor and Researcher at the Postgraduate Program in Project Management (PPGP) at Universidade Nove de Julho, stricto sensu, professor of higher education at Universidade Nove de Julho. I also work as a business consultant, applying scientific knowledge to the challenges of organizations. Post-doctorate in International Marketing from ESPM-SP. Research interests are consumer behavior, brands, dual attitudes and project marketing.

Referências

Albasteki, O. N. M. S. (2021). Corporate stakeholders, environmental and social risks, and enterprise risk management: towards an integrating framework (Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University London).

Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433-448.

Boeva, B., Zhivkova, S., & Stoychev, I. (2021). Corporate governance and the sustainable development.

Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.

De Janvry, A., & Dethier, J. J. (2012). The World Bank and governance: the Bank's efforts to help developing countries build state capacity. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6275).

Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of scientometric research, 8(3), 156-160.

Dryzek, J. S. (1996). The World Bank, Monitoring Environmental Progress: A Report on Work in ProgressWashington, DC: The World Bank, 1995. 82 pp. Journal of Public Policy, 16(1), 106-107.

Formentini, M., & Taticchi, P. (2016). Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 1920-1933.

Gani, A. (2011). Governance and growth in developing countries. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(1), 19-40.

George, C. (2007). Sustainable development and global governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 16(1), 102-125.

Grove, H., & Clouse, M. (2018). Focusing on sustainability to strengthen corporate governance. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 2(2), 38-47.

Güney, T. (2017). Governance and sustainable development: How effective is governance?. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(3), 316-335.

Hair Jr., J.F.; William, B.; Babin, B.; and Anderson, R.E (2019). Multivariate data analysis. 8th.ed. Hampshire: Cengage Learning EMEA.

Hiebl, M. R. (2023). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational research methods, 26(2), 229-261.

Khan, H., & Khan, I. U. (2012). From growth to sustainable development in developing countries: a conceptual framework. Environmental economics, (3, Iss. 1), 23-31.

Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2014). The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy. Journal of business ethics, 122, 145-165.

Klugman, J. (2011). Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity: A better future for all. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All (November 2, 2011). UNDP-HDRO Human Development Reports.

Kocmanová, A., Hřebíček, J., & Dočekalová, M. (2011). Corporate Governance and Sustainability. Economics & Management, 16.

Hope Sr, K. R. (2009). Capacity development for good governance in developing countries: some lessons from the field. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 728-740.

Huque, A. S. (2013). Can Public Management Contribute to Governance in Developing Countries? Evidence from Hong Kong. Public Organization Review, 13, 397-409.

Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Van Erck, R. P. (2005). Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of cleaner production, 13(4), 373-385.

Lameira, V., & Ness, W. (2010). The relationship between governance and sustainable development. Available at SSRN 2054660.

Raftopoulos, M., & Riethof, M. (2016). Promoting renewable energy or environmental problems? Environmental politics and sustainability in Sino-Brazilian relations. Journal of China and International Relations, 151-176.

Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Badarulzaman, N., Abdullah, A., & Behrang, M. (2019). How governance influences the components of sustainable urban development?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117983.

Rezaee, Z. (2016). Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting literature, 36(1), 48-64.

Salvioni, D. M., Gennari, F., & Bosetti, L. (2016). Sustainability and convergence: the future of corporate governance systems?. Sustainability, 8(11), 1203.

Shah, A. (Ed.). (2006). Local governance in developing countries. World Bank Publications.

Shen, L., Shuai, C., Jiao, L., Tan, Y., & Song, X. (2017). Dynamic sustainability performance during urbanization process between BRICS countries. Habitat International, 60, 19-33.

Sucre, C. (2011). Brazil's China Challenge. Cornell International Affairs Review, 5(1).

Xi, J. (2016). Cultural differences and similarities between China and Brazil: a comparative analysis using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. China and Latin America in Transition: Policy Dynamics, Economic Commitments, and Social Impacts, 227-242.

Wilkin, S. (2011). Can bad governance be good for development?. Survival, 53(1), 61-76.

World Bank (2024) World Bank Data, available at <https://data.worldbank.org/?intcid=ecr_hp_BeltC_en_ext>, acess in April the 10th.

Zeng, C., Deng, X., Dong, J., & Hu, P. (2016). Urbanization and sustainability: comparison of the processes in “BIC” countries. Sustainability, 8(4), 400.