Abstract
Purpose: This study analyzes the social responsibility actions of major Brazilian banks, focusing on the “S” pillar of ESG—Environmental, Social, and Governance. The research seeks to understand how these institutions integrate social initiatives into their sustainability strategies and how these practices align with internationally recognized frameworks such as ISO 26000, Dahlsrud’s multidimensional model, and Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A qualitative, exploratory, and documentary analysis was conducted based on the 2024 Sustainability Reports of Itaú Unibanco and Bradesco. The data were triangulated with external sources, including UN Global Compact publications, Procon complaint records, and labor court data. The study identifies social programs, inclusion metrics, and transparency practices related to workforce diversity, social investments, and stakeholder engagement.
Findings: Results reveal significant social investments and progress in diversity and inclusion policies. Itaú Unibanco demonstrates robust quantitative indicators, transparency, and external auditing, while Bradesco exhibits long-term educational impact through the Bradesco Foundation. However, both institutions show limited measurement of qualitative outcomes and insufficient evidence of stakeholder participation in program design. Contradictions between institutional discourse and consumer experience—such as high complaint and litigation rates—highlight gaps between narrative and practice.
Research Limitations/Implications: The study is limited to two private banks and secondary data sources. Future research should include longitudinal and participatory analyses involving stakeholders.
Originality/Value: This research critically advances the debate on the “S” in ESG within Brazil’s financial sector, exposing the symbolic appropriation of social responsibility discourses and emphasizing the need for authentic, impact-driven practices.
References
ABNT. ISO. ABNT NBR ISO 26000. Diretrizes sobre responsabilidade social. 1ª ed. 2010.
ALOMOTO, William; NIÑEROLA, Angels; PIÉ, Laia. Social Impact Assessment: A Systematic Review of Literature. Social Indicators Research, p.116-225, 2021.
BOWEN, Howard R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers. New York, 1953.
BANCO BRADESCO. Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2024. Osasco: Banco Bradesco S.A., 2025. Disponível em: https://banco.bradesco/html/classic/sobre/sustentabilidade/relatorio-sustentabilidade.shtm. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2025.
CARROLL, Archie B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, v. 4, n. 4, p. 497-505, 1979.
CLARK, Cynthia E.; RIERA, Marta; IBORRA, María. Toward a theoretical framework of corporate social irresponsibility: clarifying the gray zones between responsibility and irresponsibility. Business & Society, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1499-1520, 2022.
COMISSÃO, D. C. E.. Livro verde: promover um quadro europeu para a responsabilidade social das empresas. Bruxelas:[s. ed.], 2001.
DAHLSRUD, Alexander. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2008.
ETHOS, Instituto. Conceitos básicos e indicadores de responsabilidade social empresarial. São Paulo: Rede Ethos de Jornalistas, 2007.
FREEMAN, R. Edward. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation. Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie, v. 3, p. 144, 2001.
FREEMAN, R. Edward. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press, 2010.
GIL, Antonio Carlos et al. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.
GODOY, Arlida Schmidt. Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades. Revista de administração de empresas, v. 35, n. 2, p. 57-63, 1995.
ITAÚ UNIBANCO. Relatório Anual Integrado 2024. São Paulo: Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A., 2025. Disponível em: https://www.itau.com.br/sustentabilidade/relatorio-anual. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2025.
JOVEM PAN CAMPINAS. Bancos continuam à frente do ranking de reclamações do Procon Campinas em 2024. Campinas, 12 mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://jovempannewscampinas.com.br/bancos-continuam-a-frente-do-ranking-de-reclamacoes-do-procon-campinas-em-2024/. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2025.
KREITLON, Maria Priscilla. A ética nas relações entre empresas e sociedade: fundamentos teóricos da responsabilidade social empresarial. Encontro anual da Anpad, v. 28, 2004.
MACKEY, John; SISODIA, Raj. Capitalismo Consciente: Como libertar o espírito heroico dos negócios. Ed. Casa Educação, 2016.
MOIR, Lance. What do we mean by corporate social responsibility?. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 2001.
PACTO GLOBAL. Itaú Unibanco participa de plataformas da Rede Brasil. Pacto Global da ONU – Rede Brasil, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.pactoglobal.org.br/noticia/itau-unibanco-reforca-compromissos-em-direitos-humanos-e-igualdade-de-genero. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2025.
PAULO, Lavínia. Itaú, BB e mais 5 bancos enfrentam 4,4 milhões de processos; dinheiro parado chega a R$ 80 bi. Estadão e Investidor, 30 jul. 2024. Disponível em: https://einvestidor.estadao.com.br/comportamento/bancos-processos-justica-dinheiro-parado-dividendos/. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2025.
PARSONS, Richard; MOFFAT, Kieren. Constructing the meaning of social licence. Social Epistemology, v. 28, n. 3-4, p. 340-363, 2014.
PEREIRA, Tiago. Bancos seguem liderando reclamações na Justiça do Trabalho em SP. SPBancários, 12 nov. 2018. Disponível em: https://spbancarios.com.br/11/2018/bancos-seguem-liderando-reclamacoes-na-justica-do-trabalho-em-sp. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2025.
SROUR, R. H. Ética empresarial: o ciclo virtuoso dos negócios. 3. ed. revisada. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2008.
SROUR, Robert. Ética empresarial. Elsevier Brasil, 2017.
XIE, Jun; NOZAWA, Wataru; YAGI, Michiyuki; FUJII, Hidemichi; MANAGI, Shunsuke. The impact of ESG disclosures on corporate efficiency: Evidence from global companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 28, n. 2, p. 298-312, 2019.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Knowledge

